Attachment theory speaks about the bond we originally have with our caregivers. This individual relationship then often gets transferred onto other relationships in our lives. For example, when someone tells you: “You’re controlling, just like my father, or you’re always angry like my mother…Often we will find partners with whom we can replicate attachment patterns similar to the ones we know from our childhoods. In some cases, this can become problematic.
Here is a short overview of the history of attachment research:
John Bowlby (1969), defined attachment as an “innate and lasting psychological connectedness between human beings”.
Harry Harlow (1959)
The behavioral theory of attachment would suggest that an infant would form an attachment with a carer that provides food. In contrast, Harlow’s famous monkey experiment (where baby monkeys were either provided with food by an inanimate wire monkey, or could find comfort with an inanimate clothed money, and consistently preferred the clothed monkey, even that one did not provide food) suggests the explanation that attachment develops as a result of the mother providing “tactile comfort,” suggesting that infants have an innate (biological) need to touch and cling to something for emotional comfort.
Mary Ainsworth (1913 – 1999), began to systematically study infant-parent separations that a formal understanding of these individual differences was articulated. Ainsworth and her students developed a technique called the strange situation–a laboratory paradigm for studying infant-parent attachment. In the strange situation, 12-month-old infants and their parents are brought to the laboratory and, systematically, separated from and reunited with one another. In the strange situation, most children (i.e., about 60%) behave in the way implied by Bowlby’s “normative” theory.
Aside from Bowlby, other theorists contributed to the study of attachment. Ainsworth, Main, and Solomon (1986) are the main researchers who theorized the different styles of attachment that can be observed in the relationship of one person to another. These attachment styles include secure, ambivalent-secure, avoidant-insecure, and disorganized insecure attachments.
Last above is from Explorable:
explorable.comHazan and Shaver (1987) noted that the relationship between infants and caregivers and the relationship between adult romantic partners share the following features:
We may expect some adults, for example, to be secure in their relationships–to feel confident that their partners will be there for them when needed, and open to depending on others and having others depend on them. We should expect other adults, in contrast, to be insecure in their relationships. For example, some insecure adults may be anxious-resistant: they worry that others may not love them completely, and be easily frustrated or angered when their attachment needs go unmet. Others may be avoidant: they may appear not to care too much about close relationships, and may prefer not to be too dependent upon other people or to have others be too dependent upon them.